Guiding American Energy markets and producers since 2006.

Friday, June 23, 2006

Automotive and Electrical Sources

www.byronwine.com

This website posts links to numerous energetically focused articles about producing energy dramatically more efficiently than we currently do.

"For those wanting to verify the patents. Go to http://www.uspto.gov, you will find information for viewing patents.

1. Some folks at Shell Oil Co.[emphasis added] wrote "Fuel Economy of the Gasoline Engine" (ISBN 0-470-99132-1); it was published by John Wiley & Sons, New York, in 1977. On page 42 Shell Oil quotes the President of General Motors, he, in 1929, predicted 80 MPG by 1939. Between pages 221 and 223 Shell writes of their achievements: 49.73 MPG around 1939; 149.95 MPG with a 1947 Studebaker in 1949; 244.35 MPG with a 1959 Fiat 600 in 1968; 376.59 MPG with a 1959 Opel in 1973. The Library of Congress (LOC), in September 1990, did not have a copy of this book. It was missing from the files. I bought my copy from Maryland Book Exchange around 1980 after a professor informed me that it was used as an engineering text at the University of West Virginia.

VPI published a paper, March 1979, concerning maximum achievable fuel economy. This paper has several charts illustrating achievable and impossible fuel economy. About 1980 I contacted the author concerning conflicts between the paper and documented achieved "impossible" mpg. The author said, "I will get back to you.". I am still waiting for his response."

These methods dictate performance dozens of time better than what we currently receive from our fuels, from the heads of corporations in the early days of fuel technology.

Other articles examine ways of extracting hydrogen from water. By uing a certain electrical frequency Stanley Meyer, a Christian, has been able to emit hydrogen from water at an impressive rate, using less than one amp of electricity. It is some 1700% better than conventional electrolysis.

It is my belief that these methods will be more crucially discovered and applied during and after peak oil. At this time the energy giants will face massive discontent and inability to contain American and world fuel dissatisfaction. Information will spread more like wildfire than it currently does, and hundreds of thousands of new researchers will investigate these old files and new ones too and begin to apply them more and more. Science cannot remain silent.

Thankfully this will achieve pre-Better Godliness Through Chemistry levels of plentiful cheap clean energy, and the resulting society. We shall see how much time and space our current society takes up before the new one is born.

===

What is the risk of free energy? Standalone energy devices could easily replace a majority of the world's work. The people who sell energy and oil would be removed from economic fortitude, but what kind of place would they find if they abandoned oil? Saudi Arabia and the Middle East could be massively westernized or northernized or southernized or centralized if they chose to adopt free energy instead of oil. They could build factories building anything they want for about no dollars, ad be flush with things and capacity to do work. The equally divided better lot is greater than the entire present lot on a person to person basis. It would be easy to support very high qualities of living for everyone on earth and billions more with such technology and social structure in place. By 'everyone' I mean all 6.2 billion humans living here.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home